11.28.2008

HTC's Real IPhone Rival Stands Up: the Touch HD

High Tech Computer (HTC), the world's largest maker of smartphones that use Microsoft's Windows Mobile software, launched the Touch HD handset in Taipei on Wednesday, a 3.8-inch touchscreen mobile phone that more closely matches up to the iPhone 3G.

Earlier this year, HTC launched the Touch Diamond, a sleek 3G (third generation mobile telecommunications) handset meant to rival Apple's hit handset, but its screen is much smaller at 2.8-inches. The iPhone 3G sports a 3.5-inch screen.

HTC teamed up with network operator Taiwan Mobile to launch the Touch HD. Taiwan Mobile, one of the largest mobile network operators on the island by subscribers, plans to launch the device next month.

Taiwan Mobile has not yet decided on a sales plan for the Touch HD. The retail price suggested by HTC is NT$25,900 (US$776).

HTC representatives at the launch also could not give a time frame on when the Touch HD will launch in other parts of the world. Reports say the U.K. and Singapore will see the handset shortly.

The touchscreen on the Touch HD is the most responsive yet in the Touch series, but HTC representatives were unable to say why. The processor on board, a Qualcomm 7201A, is the same as that on the Touch Diamond, and both handsets use the Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.1 operating system.

The Touch HD was quicker and more responsive than the Touch Diamond, and more closely matched the touchscreen on HTC's latest development, the T-Mobile G1 (also known as the Google phone).

The Touch HD also sports a better onboard digital camera, with 5-megapixel resolution, than the Diamond.

The HD has on board GPS (global positioning system) and works with Google Maps. The 3G handset allows users to video chat, download information over mobile networks or via Wi-Fi 802.11b/g. The smartphone works on WCDMA 900/2100MHz signals and supports quad-band GSM/GPRS/EDGE.

The Touch HD weighs 147 grams, and measures 115 millimeters by 62.8mm by 12mm.

Taiwan Mobile threw out a strong sales pitch during the Taipei news conference. The company faces stiff competition from the upcoming launch of the iPhone 3G by market leader Chunghwa Telecom.

Cliff Lai, chief operating officer at Taiwan Mobile, called on Taiwanese patriots to buy the locally made Touch HD amid the global financial crisis.

"If we went with the iPhone, our money would go to America," he said. "But we're not interested in boosting the American economy. We're interested in boosting Taiwan's economy."

Source: Yahoo New

11.25.2008

The End of Instant Messaging

It's the end of instant messaging as we know it. Those chat boxes once commonplace on a computer desktop amid documents, Web browsers, and spreadsheets are giving way to a new breed of user-friendly, real-time conversation tools that Internet companies hope will keep users engaged with their content—and the advertising that appears alongside it.

Case in point: Microsoft's (MSFT) Nov. 13 announcement that it will integrate its instant message service, Messenger, used by 300 million people, more closely with its Windows Live e-mail and social networking sites. So instead of having to toggle to a separate window, downloaded to a desktop, users can strike up a real-time conversation with someone else right from an application they're already using—say, Hotmail.

Like other companies hoping to make money from the Internet, Microsoft is responding to consumers' waning interest in standalone IM tools and their desire for chat features closely connected to their favorite sites. Like e-mail, games, and other categories that have gradually migrated away from downloaded and off-the-shelf software, instant messaging is shifting toward the Web, where it can be accessed from any computer while taking up no space on a hard drive.

Embedded IM
AOL (TWX) Instant Messenger, the desktop chat program that was once the gold standard in the category, saw unique visitors decline 4% in the year ending September 2008, according to comScore (SCOR). During the same period, two of the top four standalone programs—AOL's ICQ and Chinese-language Tencent QQ—had declines in minutes used.

Instead of spending time with these old-fashioned chat windows, Web users are flocking to sites like Facebook and Google's (GOOG) Gmail, where instant messaging tools are more closely embedded in what they are doing. For Web operators that get it right, embedded IM could increase the amount of time users spend on their sites, engaging with content while chatting with pals. Embedded Web-based IM tools may also appeal more to advertisers.

Most web users over 20 years old were introduced to instant messaging by AOL's pioneering service. But the wide range of chat options is making it harder to compete for instant messages, says David Liu, senior vice-president of AOL People Networks. "Activity [in AIM] is going down because of all the different sites available," Liu says. "So we're working on making AIM more social and viral."

Facebook's Chatting Toolbar
One way AOL hopes to do that is by linking AIM to the company's social networking site, Bebo. In early 2009, AOL plans to unveil an IM dashboard that travels with Bebo users from page to page. The selling point: Every one of AIM's 30 million users will get instant access to a Bebo profile page that's already set up with their "buddy list."

Instant messaging is also top-of-mind at the world's fastest-growing social network, Facebook. Earlier this year, the site installed a toolbar that lets friends chat one-on-one while they browse the site. According to product manager Peter Deng, some 75 million people—a little more than 60% of active users—have tried out the toolbar. "We had messaging, we had wall-to-wall [posting], and we thought having that private conversation was necessary," Deng says. "It enables a channel of constant communication between you and your friends."

Some smaller social networks are catching on to chat's appeal, too. Earlier this year, Joe Greenstein, chief executive of Flixster, an online social network for film buffs, noticed that users were interacting with each other in real time, discussing and suggesting movies, rather than posting a review and coming back to check for responses later. Some days, users would leave tens of thousands of short messages. So in October, Greenstein introduced a new feature, a Web-based instant messaging toolbar that lets Flixster users see which friends are online and chat with them one-on-one.

Next: Embedded Advertising
Flixster's toolbar was created by Meebo, a Silicon Valley startup launched in 2005. Over the next six months, Meebo will roll out similar Web-based IM toolbars for 19 other sites looking to increase community engagement. Meebo Chief Executive Seth Sternberg says the pitch is easy for Web publishers looking to keep users on their sites longer: "The interesting thing about live chat is that it forces the user to focus persistently," he says. "If a site's [average engagement time] is three minutes, we can move it to six."

Eventually, Flixster and other Meebo partner sites will embed advertising inside the IM toolbar, or in text conversations themselves. Sternberg says this will present a new opportunity to advertise in IM via a new target. A Flixster user, for example, might be able to view a trailer for a movie inside the chat window itself, all the while exchanging short messages about it with a pal.

It's about time Web companies breathe new life into IM, says Eric Druckenmiller, vice-president of media at interactive marketing agency Deep Focus. "If you look at the distribution of IM, it dwarfs [many other channels of online advertising], but marketers haven't paid attention to it since the late '90s," he says. But a recent project where Deep Focus placed ads for Havaianas sandals on Meebo's own IM site convinced him that the channel has more potential for advertising.

When Microsoft unveiled the new chat functions on its Windows Live pages, it was in some ways playing catch-up to its biggest rivals, Google and Yahoo! (YHOO). In the past two years, as those sites have vied to become one-stop destinations for online communities, they have included IM tools throughout their pages. The idea is to make everything from e-mail to spreadsheets more collaborative and open—and ultimately, more addictive and profitable.

Yahoo's Aggressive IM Branding
Google offers chat capability in its Google Talk desktop application, in Gmail Chat, within such collaborative Google Docs like the word processor, and in widgets that users can install on their custom iGoogle home pages. "Talk is about choice and we want people to have instant messaging with them where they need it," says Seth Demsey, product manager for Google Talk. On Nov. 12 the company announced a new feature for Gmail Chat: free videoconferencing.

Yahoo has 116 million users of its standalone IM application, compared with Google Talk's 6 million. Yahoo has been more aggressive at introducing advertising to IM. It uses display ads and contextual ads, such as offering links to a Yahoo map if users enter an address. Yahoo also employs branded entertainment—a mini-Coca-Cola (KO) soccer game is embedded in the IM window—and branded virtual goods, such as a customized background theme around a musical act or sports team.

Is there room for so many different IM services on the Web? Possibly. According to Palo Alto-based technology researcher The Radicati Group, consumer IM traffic will grow to 711 million users worldwide in 2011, a 43% increase from 2008.

But still others are predicting that IM users will increasingly want to tear down the walls between platforms and find their entire community of friends in one place—whether it looks like a toolbar, an e-mail folder, or a desktop application.

Source: Business Week

11.21.2008

Google to pre-install Chrome browser?

The search giant looks at pre-installing Chrome on personal computers in a bid to break dominance of Microsoft’s Internet Explorer

Google is considering pre-installing its Chrome browser on personal computers in the search giant’s latest challenge to the dominance of Microsoft’s Internet Explorer.

The move would significantly ramp up the browser war that Google launched against Microsoft when it launched Chrome in September, in the battle to dominate how users access and interact with the web.

Latest industry figures show that Internet Explorer currently enjoys a 71.3 per cent market share worldwide, with Mozilla Firefox at nearly 20 per cent. Chrome is used by less than 1 per cent of all web users, but is still under public testing before a final version is ready to launch.

Speaking to The Times, Sundar Pichai, Google Vice President, Product Management, revealed that Chrome will be ready to come out of “beta” testing by January, and that the search giant was looking at ways to make Chrome the browser of choice for the everyday user.

“We will probably do distribution deals,” he said, adding, “we could work with an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) and have them ship computers with Chrome pre-installed.”

He added that versions of Chrome should also be available of computers using Macintosh or Linux software in the first half of next year, allowing the browser to be used on almost 99 per cent of computers worldwide.

Analysts said that Microsoft eventually defeated Netscape Navigator in the first browser wars during the late 1990s primarily because Internet Explorer came installed on computers that operated the Windows operating system, and as a result became the default choice for most web users.

Richard Holway, Chairman of Tech Market View, the industry analysts, said that due to strict anti-trust rulings since, it would be hard to block Google doing deals with computer makers to install Chrome on their PCs.

He said: “If any manufacturer wished to install Chrome, that should now be possible.”

Microsoft said it would not comment on its current commercial or distribution deals with hardware manufacturers. John Curran, UK head of Windows, said he believed Microsoft can withstand the threat posed by Google’s Chrome.

“The browser space is competitive and people end up choosing what’s best for them,” he said. “For the overall majority of UK users, that’s Internet Explorer.”

The latest version of Microsoft’s browser, Internet Explorer 8, was launched in August. It will come as standard with all PCs using the latest version of its operating system, Windows 7, which should be ready be used on most computers by January 2010.

Mr Pichai said that once a glitch-free version of Chrome browser is launched early next year, Google will make a determined push to advertise its browser to the wider public.

Mr Pichai said: “We will throw our weight behind it. We’ve been conservative because its still in beta, but once we get it out of beta we will work hard at getting the word out, promoting to users, and marketing will be a part of that.”

Source: TimesOnline

11.18.2008

Google's Voice-Search App for iPhone Glitches

The much-anticipated Google voice-search application for Apple's iPhone, which was trumpeted to be available for download on Friday, has arrived on Apple's App Store a bit later than expected. A reviewer says the application is okay, but needs some fine-tuning.

Called Google Mobile App, it allows users to search the Web by voice and finally debuted late Monday. "Companies announce iPhone apps all of the time, and sometimes they make it through in a timely manner and sometimes it is delayed," said Michael Gartenberg, vice president of mobile strategy at Jupitermedia.

iPhone owners need not press the touchscreen or type, just wait for a beep and say what they are searching for, according to Google. Another way to start a voice search is by tapping the microphone. If you're in a meeting and can't talk, Google Mobile App also allows you to type a search question.

The app has a personalized search-location feature which recognizes where you are when requesting a search. To use this feature, however, users must enable location services on the iPhone and allow Google Mobile App to use the location.

'Not Quite There Yet'

Glitches appeared not just in the app's availability, but also in its features.

"This is not exactly brand-new," Gartenberg said. "It mostly works, but my experience with it was that it generated errors and that voice recognition is not quite there yet, but it does show what is possible."

Asked if Google and Apple rolled out the app prematurely, Gartenberg said, "I think it is working well enough to be out and this is not a problem, but I'd expect it to be refined."

Apple and Google get a lot of attention when they roll out new products, but put the two together in the same sentence and the attention jumps tenfold. For this reason the companies gained a lot of attention before the app was available and even more when it was delayed. Speculation on the Web said Apple was conspiring against Google, while others said Apple simply forgot to make the app available.

"It just underscores how, when you talk about Apple and Google in the same sentence, conspiracy theories will fly," Gartenberg said.

Regardless of the hype, Gartenberg said, the Google Mobile App could use some refining. "It is a voice-search application and we've seen them before," he said. "This one is pretty good, but there are better out there on the market. It is a nice feature if you own an iPhone and use Google search."

What's Next?

Bringing speech-recognition technology into search is a natural evolution for Google. Before the Google Mobile App, less feature-rich apps have been available from Google, like GOOG-411, or Google Voice Local Search, a telephone service that allows users to search businesses by calling a toll-free number. The service uses speech-recognition technology to connect the user to a requested search.

Then there's the voice-search feature for the BlackBerry, which Google began testing in July. Users of select models such as the BlackBerry Pearl can speak a business query instead of typing it.

Other voice-recognition technologies include Microsoft's Tellme service, Yahoo's oneSearch with Voice, and Samsung's Speech to Action feature on the Samsung Instinct phone.

Source: Yahoo Tech News

11.13.2008

Google Releases SEO Guide

Webmasters often ask us at conferences or in the Webmaster Help Group, "What are some simple ways that I can improve my website's performance in Google?" There are lots of possible answers to this question, and a wealth of search engine optimization information on the web, so much that it can be intimidating for newer webmasters or those unfamiliar with the topic. We thought it'd be useful to create a compact guide that lists some best practices that teams within Google and external webmasters alike can follow that could improve their sites' crawlability and indexing.

Our Search Engine Optimization Starter Guide covers around a dozen common areas that webmasters might consider optimizing. We felt that these areas (like improving title and description meta tags, URL structure, site navigation, content creation, anchor text, and more) would apply to webmasters of all experience levels and sites of all sizes and types. Throughout the guide, we also worked in many illustrations, pitfalls to avoid, and links to other resources that help expand our explanation of the topics. We plan on updating the guide at regular intervals with new optimization suggestions and to keep the technical advice current.

So, the next time we get the question, "I'm new to SEO, how do I improve my site?", we can say, "Well, here's a list of best practices that we use inside Google that you might want to check out."

Source: Webmaster Central

11.09.2008

Google Allows Malicious Sites in SERPs

After searching Google today as I often do, I found a result ranked high in Google's search engine result pages (SERPs) on page one for a competitive keyword. Under the result was a link generated by Google that stated "This site may harm your computer."

Here is what Google has to say about it:

Concerns About Web Search Results: Results labeled 'This site may harm your computer'

We want our users to feel safe when they search the web, and we're continuously working to identify dangerous sites and increase protection for our users. This warning message appears with search results we've identified as sites that may install malicious software on your computer:

Google search result link warning

If you click the title of the result, you'll be shown the following warning rather than being taken immediately to the webpage in question:
Final Google search result click through warning

You can choose to continue to the site at your own risk. However, please be aware that malicious software is often installed without your knowledge or permission when you visit these sites, and can include programs that delete data on your computer, steal personal information such as passwords and credit card numbers, or alter your search results...

There is no doubt that Google's technology creates the "smartest search engine" to date. That being said, why does Google allow these sites in their search results, let alone at the top...and for that matter...in their index? I guess Google being the "smartest search engine" still has a lot to learn...but at least we get a warning!

11.08.2008

Simple Text Ads Get More Clicks

Consumers are more likely to click on simple text advertisements than elaborate interactive ads, new research shows.

According to a US-based survey conducted by iPerceptions, 25 per cent of consumers tend to click on simple texts ads, compared to just 11 per cent who are more likely to click on video ads.

The findings showed that the only demographic that showed any significant level of enthusiasm for video ads were web users those under the age of 25, who account for almost one third of the video ad-viewing audience.

Some 65 per cent of consumers likely to click on online ads are weekly or daily browsers; 15 per cent are first-time visitors and just six per cent frequent websites on a sporadic basis.

Jonathan Levitt, vice president of marketing at iPerceptions, said: “Our research shows that inexpensive banner and text ads are still preferred among web consumers.

“Media sites that offer consumers compelling content and features - encouraging repeat visits - generate much better ad click-through rates than less engaging sites.”

Source: Zero Strategy

11.02.2008

Hard Drive Recovery for Laptops

Wherever you go, technology grants you to take your data with you. This is not the world of sticking to your fixed desktop, but you can be in touch with the business people by just carrying the suitcase sized laptops with you. These mobile tools let you to access the Internet, attend the teleconferences, maintain the data, and others which a big desktop can benefit. All these features make laptops the business need and the storehouse of large amount of data.

With the topmost reason viz. mobility, you will find this device in almost each professional´s hands. But dark shadow of data loss has also covered this device; in fact the chances are comparatively high. This happens when its boon of mobility turns into bane, when suddenly your laptop suffers the dropdown. Walking on the road, carrying your laptop can be detrimental to your business if a sudden crash leaves you with no choice. Actually, the choice is there with the hard drive recovery services of laptops.

Recovering data from laptops is a tough job, one of the reasons being that without the set of proper equipments you can´t detach your hard drive to be shipped to the hard disk recovery services. Perhaps, you need to send it as a whole. These may be suffering many harsh situations, which a desktop hard drive would never be exposed to.

Laptop´s hard drives may cover the data which had been collected in the social business gatherings, but this open the doorway to many harsh incidents to the hard drive. Thus hard drive recovery for laptop requires more precise examination and data recovery procedures. The choice of Clean Rooms also becomes quite fussy.

The risk of more damage or incomplete hard disk recovery increases if you get pampered by the cheap quality data recovery services. This also rises up with the silly acts of users, which are hoped for hard drive recovery.

Also the pocket soothing hard disk recovery services may attract you with the suitable norms, but have you find it out what has been the success rate of the company, especially in hard drive recovery services for laptops. Yes, this is practically significant and without it you may be pushing your laptop data to the real mess.

Stellar Information Systems Limited offers you the most worth hard drive recovery services for all the media, including that of laptop hard drives. The sterilized surroundings of Class 100 Clean Rooms would not let the dust like particles to enter, where data recovery experts work for sake of data recovery at best.

No pitfall has yet been faced in hard disk recovery services, provided by Stellar. The company holds the record of solving the harshest data loss issues.

Source: American Chronicle

11.01.2008

Build Backlinks the Smart Way

Getting Backlinks Naturally
Many backlinks are achieved the natural way. When your website provides users with useful content, webmasters and website owners will often link to these useful web pages (on your site) for their website visitors to use. Most often then not, these sites that link to yours naturally are relevant to your sites content. Also known as "targeted backlinks", these types of backlinks are the most beneficial when generating quality traffic from them. Getting natural backlinks, however, is a slow process. These are built mostly on trust and gaining trust takes time.

Building Backlinks
One of the acceptable ways of building quality backlinks is listing your site in directories, posting in forums, and submitting to article directories. What you want to avoid is link farms, spam sites or sites that host illegal content, purchasing links in bulk, etc. An easy way to find sites that except these "one-way" link submissions is by using a backlinks finder.

Getting Listed in Directories
Getting listed in directories like DMOZ and Yahoo is a must because this is a way to get some quality backlinks for free and your site is easily noticed by search engines and potential visitors. Generally inclusion in these directories is free but the drawback is that sometimes you have to wait months before you get listed...or not listed at all. Top directories like DMOZ and Yahoo have strict guidlines when submitting, so follow the rules carefully. Yahoo also has a "pay for review" option that is costly and does not mean you will get listed. I would suggest submitting the free listing first, then wait a few months to see if your site is listed before considering the paid option.

Article Directories and Forums
Generally search engines index forums so posting in forums is way great way to get quality backlinks. Join forums with subject matter relevant to your site, add your URL (link) with anchor text of your choice to your forum signature, then contribute to the discussions. Be sure that you abide by the forum rules before you post anything...and do not post just for the backlinks. Forum administrators are not stupid. If your are truly contributing, your posts will not get deleted and you won't get banned. Also, sometimes administrators do not allow links in posts, unless they are relevant ones, so it is best to leave your link in your signature.

Submitting articles to directories can be more time-consuming then posting in forums. If you can write good articles on subjects related to your site, it's well worth the backlinks.

Feed them with RSS
Offer free content through RSS feeds to interested sites. When the other site publishes your RSS feeds, you will not only get backlinks to your site, but potentially a lot of visitors. Publishers of the feeds in return get to add relevant content to their site. It's a "win-win situation".

Press Releases
Submitting press releases to news sites is another great way to buil backlinks and generate traffic. Write professional press releases about "what's new" on your site. The dificult part is that you cannot release press releases if there is nothing "newsworthy".

What to Avoid
Avoid link exchange programs, which offer to "swap" links with unsuspecting website owners. First off, these programs spider email addresses and "spam" website owners with requests. the more you get involved, the more outbound links you have to place on your site that link to pages that link to yours. Search engines frown on this. They are much "smarter" today then they ever were in the past...especially Google. This practice can also get your site banned. It is not natural linking, and search engines know it.